2 Mich. App. 288 - Oppenhuizen v. Wennersten’s Empirical Analysis
1966
Citation profile
14 federal appellate · 13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently December 2009 · most notably 359 So. 2d 430 - Wackenhut Corp. v. Canty (1978), Ernst & Young, L.L.P. v. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Co. (2001)
14 federal appellate · 13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“where a party makes false representations to another with the intent or knowledge that they be exhibited or repeated to a third party for the purpose of deceiving him, that third party can maintain a tort action against the party making the false statements for the damages resulting from the fraud.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Nernberg v. Pearce
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.