Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

2 Miles 13

Kearney v. Collins

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · decided 1836-03-23

THIS action was brought to D. T. ’35, 334. Plaintiff filed a copy of an instrument of writing executed by the defendant (which follows) under the act of 28th March 1835, and entered judgment for want of an affidavit of defence. Defendant obtained this rule to show cause why the judgment should not be set aside.

Decided 1836-03-23

Per Curiam.—

¶1This is not an “ instrument of writing for the payment of money” within the meaning of the act, for two reasons. 1. It is not an agreement to pay a sum certain, and nothing appears of record by which the amount of the arrears oí interest can be ascertained. 2. It is not an agreement to pay money, but to “ settle” an unascertained amount of interest due on a mortgage. To “ settle” does not always mean a payment, or even a payment in money. It may consist of the mere striking of a balance where there may have been interest accounts, a compromise, composition, payment in goods or the procurement of a release. Nothing on this subject is left to us by the act, by way of inference, to help the plaintiff’s claim to have judgment.

¶2Judgment set aside.

/2/miles/13 · .json · Public domain