Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

2 Miles 257

Stuart v. Ralston

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · decided 1838-09-29

THE following case was stated for the opinion of the court. “ This is an action brought by the plaintiffs as holders, against the defendants as drawers of a bill of exchange on London, for the amount of the bill with damages, it having been protested for non-payment.

Decided 1838-09-29

Per Curiam.—

¶1The question submitted is, whether the damages ai*e to be computed at the rate of exchange at the time of the notice of protest, or at the rate at the time of the presentment of the bill to the drawer. Although the second section of the act of 1821 specifies that the damages shall be ascertained and determined by the rate “at the time of notice of protest and demand of payment,” yet the following words, “as before mentioned,” refer to the provisions of the first section, which designate that “ whenever any bill &c., shall be returned unpaid, with a protest,” the payee shall have his damages and charges. The act therefore contemplates that the notice of protest and demand must be accompanied with the return of the bill, or otherwise the drawer is not liable for the damages. And it would be strange if the drawer could be compelled to pay the principal and damages upon merely receiving notice of protest, while the bill might be in the hands of third persons.

¶2Judgment for defendant.

/2/miles/257 · .json · Public domain