¶1This being an equity action, the trial must be without a jury. The order appealed from does not attempt to take away that right.
¶2The action was ordered for trial as a preferred cause on the short cause calendar, which is in the court a calendar made up of equity causes and actions on contract that may be tried within one hour.
¶3The fact that the said order recites that the trial shall take place hi part two instead of part four, the latter being the equity trial part, is inconsequential, plainly a clerical error, and was so regarded by the calendar clerk and the attorneys for the parties hereto, because the action was actually placed on part four calendar, and there appeared and was answered to by said attorneys.
¶4The justice sitting in that part when it appears for trial will try it without a jury, as are all equity actions tried.
¶5*479The justice who made the order had a right to do so, if in the interests of justice he deemed it proper to order a speedy trial herein.
¶6The appellant cannot complain, having received due notice ■of trial.
¶7Any cause may be taken out of its regular place on the calendar by the court and made a preferred cause, and a speedy trial ordered, if, as above stated, justice so requires.
¶8This is an inherent right which the court has, and does not depend upon nor is it restricted by any section of the Code of Civil Procedure. Smith v. Keepers, 5 Civ. Proc. Rep. 66.
¶9The only objection to the order is, that respondent failed to pay the costs awarded appellant by a prior General Term of this court.
¶10The costs so awarded were motion costs, and until paid, all proceedings of respondent are stayed by virtue of section 779 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
¶11For this reason the order appealed from must be reversed, but without costs, with leave to respondent to apply again for such an order upon payment of the unpaid costs just mentioned.
¶12McGowh and Yah Wyck, JJ., concúr.
¶13Order reversed.