Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2 MISS 183 - Davis v. Minor

Davis v. Minor’s Empirical Analysis

1835

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
3
states following
July 2004
most recently cited

3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently July 2004

3 state decisions

10183518401850186018701880189019001910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Dash v. Van Kleeck

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “it is clear that the moment the remedy was gone, by the running of the statute, the right was gone also ... and [a party] could not be deprived of the privilege ... by subsequent legislation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.