¶1Note. — Vide, as corroborative of this decision, Jones’s Law of Bailments, 106. On the subject of common carriers in this State, vide Spicy v. Farmer’s adm’r. 2 Hay. 339Williamson v. Branson, 1 Mur. 417. Backhouse v. Snead, Ibid. 174. Adam v. Hay, 3 Mur. 149.
2 N.C. 19
v. Jackson
Superior Court of North Carolina
Decided April 15, 1792
Superior Court of North Carolina · decided 1792-04-15
The Plaintiff, a merchant, employed the Defendant, fbr a reward, to bring goods and merchandize from Virginia, to Hillsborough, in this State, in his waggon , the Defendant received the goods in Virginia, and in bringing them to Hillsborough, when about to cross a river, the flat receded from one of the fore wheels of the wag-gon, and it ran with the goods into the river, and the goods were greatly damaged and impaired in value, The Defendant did not make it his common and…
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently October 1974
1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1792-04-15
View the full empirical analysis of this case →