¶1Note. — Quere, whether this cage is not overruled by the case of Walker's Ex’rs. v. Campbell & others, 1 Hawks 304, in which it vas" held, that a debt barred hv the statute oi limitations is not revived -..y a direction in the debtor. will, that certa.n slaves be sold “and t with the proceeds there of, paying my debts, they,” &c. See also Barke v. Jones, 2 Ves & Beam. 275.
2 N.C. 279
Anonymous
Superior Court of North Carolina
Decided October 15, 1795
Superior Court of North Carolina · decided 1795-10-15
One of the questions in this case was, whether the Plaintiff was barred by the act of limitations. The note oí’hand was given in the year 1783, in the month October or .November.
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1795-10-15
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently July 1996
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →