Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

2 N.C. App. 406

State v. Campbell

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 18, 1968

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · decided 1968-09-18

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently December 1968

2 state decisions

Relies on State v. Elliott · State v. Hopper

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1968-09-18

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Britt, J.

¶1Following his conviction in Superior Court, defendant requested that an attorney other than his trial attorney be assigned to represent him on appeal to this Court. Attorney L. Hugh West, Jr., was appointed and proceeded to perfect the appeal; however, said attorney states in the record that he has carefully read the record and the law with respect thereto and can find nothing in the record which he can in good faith assign as error. At the same time, he requests that this Court carefully review-the record and grant the defendant a new trial if reversible error is discovered.

¶2Accordingly we- have carefully reviewed the entire record in this case and find that the defendant was given a fair trial, free from prejudicial error, and that the sentences imposed were within statu*407tory limits. State v. Hopper, 271 N.C. 464, 156 S.E. 2d 857; State v. Elliott, 269 N.C. 683, 153 S.E. 2d 330.

¶3The judgment of the Superior Court is Affirmed.

BrocK and Parker, JJ., concur.
/2/ncapp/406 · .json · Public domain