2 Neb. Ct. App. 545 - State v. Ramold’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently March 2016
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Matlock · Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York City · State v. Van Ackeren · State v. Benzel · United States v. Sumlin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“There is no reasonable expectation of privacy to be protected under such circumstances. We cannot see how the additional fact of Appellant’s initial refusal to consent in any way lessened the risk assumed that his co-occupant would consent. This additional fact does not increase a reasonable expectation of privacy.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“a joint occupant assumes the risk of his exposing their common private areas to such a search.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Miller
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.