2 Neb. Ct. App. 730 - Shade v. Ayars & Ayars, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Ricciardi v. Damar Products Co. · Kraft v. Paul Reed Construction & Supply, Inc. · 2 Neb. Ct. App. 703 - Pearson v. Lincoln Telephone Co. · Wiese v. Becton-Dickinson Co. · Feaster v. S. K. Kelso & Sons
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) Did the employer sponsor the event? (2) Was attendance really voluntary? (3) Did the employer encourage attendance as reflected by its (a) taking a record of attendance, (b) paying employees for the time spent at the event, (c) requiring the employee to work if he or she did not attend, or (d) maintaining a known custom of attending? (4) Did the employer substantially finance the occasion? (5) Did the employees regard the event as a benefit to which they were entitled? and (6) Did the employer benefit from the event, not merely in a vague way through better morale and good will, but through such tangible advantages as having an opportunity to make speeches and awards?”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.