State v. Sorenson’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
February 2025
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Federal Power Commission v. Louisiana Power & Light Co. · United States v. Villano · Davis v. United States · United States v. Daddino · Marshall v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“this framework is used only when the oral pronouncement is ambiguous. It is not applicable when an unambiguous oral pronouncement conflicts with the written judgment, when an oral pronouncement is inadvertent yet unambiguous, or when the oral pronouncement is silent as to whether multiple sentences are to run consecutively or concurrently.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Sorenson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.