Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

2 N.H. 287

Perkins v. Webster

Superior Court of New Hampshire

Decided October 15, 1820

Superior Court of New Hampshire · decided 1820-10-15

Jt. corve ved fo B, by deed “a certain piece of land, the whole of lot No. *• exet-pr 50 acres deeded to S. P the lot to contain 200 acres by measure, be-vidi This was an action of covenant broken.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1820-10-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently March 1915

8 state decisions

401820183018401850186018701880189019001910decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

By the court.

¶1If we were to give the least countenance to the opinion, that loose and doubtful expressions, used in the description of lands in deeds of conveyance, may be construed as covenants, it would lead to endless litigation and fraud. They would be easily inserted by the artful and designing in any deed; and the simple and uninformed might be readily entrapped by them, without the least suspicion.

¶2In the present case, we cannot construe the phrase, “ the “ lot to contain two hundred acres by measure,” as a covenant, that it contained that quantity, but consider it merely as a part of the description of the land. In most cases, it is very easy to ascertain the quantity of land in any tract before the conveyance. Where that cannot be done, if the grantee chooses to have a stipulation, as to the quantity in fhe deed, it must be by a clear and express covenant. -

¶3Judgment for the defendant.

/2/nh/287 · .json · Public domain