Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2 N.J. 1 - Isserman v. Isserman

Isserman v. Isserman’s Empirical Analysis

1949

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
2
states following
November 2003
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently November 2003

20 state decisions

1001949195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sherrer v. Sherrer · 138 N.J. Eq. 140 - Isserman v. Isserman · Tuttle v. Gilmore · Jewett v. Dringer · 127 N.J. Eq. 333 - Wemple v. B. F. Goodrich Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When an order of an appellate court goes with its remittitur to the court of original jurisdiction, it is there for the purpose of being carried into effect, and not for revision, correction or reversal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “* * * it was his [respondent's] privilege to go to the Court of Errors and Appeals, setting forth the new matter, and seek a recall of the remittitur and a review.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.