Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2 NY 269 - Candee v. . Lord

Candee v. . Lord’s Empirical Analysis

1849

Citation profile

50
cited by 50 later decisions
11
states following
June 1981
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 1 district · 41 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently June 1981 · most notably Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Boyd (1913), Compton v. Jesup (1895)

6 federal appellate · 1 district · 41 state decisions — followed in 11 states

170184918501860187018801890190019101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We think otherwise. The law which gave the judgment debtor the unlimited right (when honestly exercised) to contract debts, to settle and adjust their amount, to secure and to pay them, made him to that extent the representative of all his creditors who should seek the satisfaction of their demands out of his property. So far, at least, they are in privity with, and claim under, their debtor.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““In creating debts, or establishing the relation of debtor and creditor, the debtor is accountable to no one unless he acts mala fide. A judgment, therefore, obtained against the latter without collusion, is conclusive evidence of the relation of debtor and creditor against others. * * * Where, however, fraud is established, the creditor does not claim through the debtor but adversely to him, and by a title paramount, which overreaches and annuls the fraudulent conveyance or judgment by which the latter himself would be es-topped.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.