Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

2 N.Y.2d 278

People v. Kalan

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 24, 1957

New York Court of Appeals · decided 1957-01-24

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently February 1966

10 federal appellate ·

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1957-01-24

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1When this appellant filed his appeal, as of right, in the court below it was apparent that he was penniless, and unable to employ counsel or to pay for a transcript of the trial minutes; that he was in prison and physically unable to inspect the transcript of the minutes which had been filed in the Clerk’s office of Queens County pursuant to section 456 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. While we do not decide that failure to appoint counsel will always constitute a deprivation of constitutional rights, we nonetheless hold that, under the circumstances of this case, refusal to assign counsel upon defendant’s request prevented an effective use of the right to appeal in violation of the constitutional guarantees of due process and equal protection. (N. Y. Const., art. I, §§ 6, 11.)

¶2The judgment should be reversed and the appeal remitted to the Appellate Divison for further proceedings in accordance with this opinion.

Conway, Ch. J., Desmond, Dye, Fuld, Froessel, Van Voorhis and Burke, JJ., concur.

¶3Judgment reversed, etc.

/2/ny2d/278 · .json · Public domain