Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2 N.Y.3d 14 - People v. Cahill

People v. Cahill’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
6
states following
November 2024
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently November 2024 · most notably State v. Moore (2009), 894 So. 2d 88 - Busby v. State (2005)

9 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

180200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Zant v. Stephens · Lowenfield v. Phelps · People v. . Flaherty · The People v. . Casey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The only possible reason for having this cockeyed sentencing scheme — and for insisting that capital jurors be informed of it — is to put pressure on [jurors in the minority] holding out for life to switch to death so that the defendant is not made eligible for parole as a result of a nonunanimous verdict”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “"The court must also instruct the jury that in the event the jury fails to reach unanimous agreement with respect to the sentence, the court will sentence the defendant to a term of imprisonment with a minimum term of between twenty and twenty-five years and a maximum term of life."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “entertains such conscientious opinions either against or in favor of such punishment as to preclude such juror from rendering an impartial verdict or from properly exercising the discretion conferred upon such juror by law in the determination of a sentence”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.