¶1As said in Re Thompson, (Case of Drisler,) ante, 35, (decided by the court at this term,) the award of the commissioners cannot be set aside unless the inadequacy be gross, or the commissioners fell into some error of principle. We do not think that it can be said that the award is grossly unfair. On the contrary, there is reason to believe that the appellant’s claim was largely fictitious. The commissioners did not err in refusing to award damages to appellant’s property by the blasting. It is claimed that his horse was killed by a stone, and a building struck. If this was the case, there was an actual trespass committed, (St. Peter v. Denison, 58 N. Y. 417,) for which the land-owner may recover in an action. It was therefore not a proper subject of consideration in these proceedings. In re Thompson, (Case of Cammann,) 43 Hun, 416. Award and order appealed from should be affirmed, with $10 costs.
2 N.Y.S. 35
In re Thompson
Decided May 14, 1888
New York Supreme Court · decided 1888-05-14
In the matter of the petition of Hubert O. Thompson, commissioner, etc., for the appointment of commissioners of appraisal, under the aqueduct act, (Laws N. Y. 1883, c. 490,) to condemn lands belonging to George Hart. Defendant appeals from the award of damages assessed by the commissioners.
Relies on St. Peter v. . Denison
Decided 1888-05-14