2 Ohio App. 3d 364 - State v. Morrison’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
37 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently April 2006 · most notably State v. Lewis (1998), State v. McCallum (1991)
37 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Brown v. Texas · 47 Ohio App. 2d 181 - State v. Moore · 32 Ohio App. 2d 54 - State v. Conley · Holmes v. Union Gospel Press · 50 Ohio App. 2d 72 - Ryan v. Andrews
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A driving under suspension case requires only that the person drive an automobile on a public highway while his license is suspended under a provision of the Ohio Revised Code. Therefore, a charge of driving under suspension is akin to a strict liabilty statute and requires no culpable mental state on the part of the defendant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[N]otice sent to the address appearing on a licensee's most recent license application or a new address which the licensee specifically supplies to the BMV is the `most current address' and complies with a statutory requirement that notice be sent to a licensee's `last known address.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[A]n object, such as a white powder or pill, which lacks unique identifying characteristics must be shown to have been under the care of a continuous chain of custodians up to the moment that the item is identified.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.