Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2 Ohio App. 3d 421 - Bright v. Collins

2 Ohio App. 3d 421 - Bright v. Collins’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
1
states following
July 2013
most recently cited

28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently July 2013 · most notably 33 Ohio App. 3d 214 - Leighner v. Leighner (1986), 70 Ohio App. 3d 188 - Cole v. Cole (1990)

28 state decisions

1101982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 2 Ohio App. 3d 86 - Cheek v. Cheek · 2 Ohio App. 3d 84 - In Re MacHmer · 114 Ohio App. 474 - Lucas v. Lucas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““(A) In a * * * child support proceeding, the court may order either or both parents to support or help support their children * * *. In determining the amount reasonable or necessary for child support, * * * the court shall consider all relevant factors including: “(1) The financial resources of the child; “(2) The financial resources and needs of the custodial parent and of the noncustodial parent, when there is only one custodian; “(3) The standard of living the child would have enjoyed had the marriage continued; “(4) The physical and emotional condition of the child, and his educational needs; “(5) The financial resources and needs of both parents, when there are joint custodians; “(6) The educational needs of the child and the educational opportunities that would have been available to him had the circumstances requiring a court order for his support not arisen.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.