Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

2 Ohio Law. Abs. 539

State v. Lutsch

Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County · decided 1924-07-01

Decided 1924-07-01

DIXON, J.‘

¶1Epitomized Opinion

¶2Action by Prohibition Commissioners to enforce “Padlock Law” by injunction. Petition alleges violations of the prohibition law between certain dates. The demurrer was overruled.

¶3In an action to abate a nuisance under 13195-1 GC. proof that the defendant has been repeatedly convinced of violating Ithe prohibition laws warrants the .presumption that violations will continue unless injunctive relief is granted, and it is not necessary to show constant and uninterrupted violations right up to the tim’e of filing suit.

/2/ohiolawabs/539 · .json · Public domain