Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

2 Ohio St. 2d 111

Lamonge v. Maxwell

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1965

Ohio Supreme Court · decided 1965-04-21

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently September 2025

4 state decisions

Relies on Walker v. Maxwell

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1965-04-21

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1As grounds for his release petitioner urges that the amendment to the indictment voided the indictment, that the grand jury was improperly selected, and that errors were committed in relation to the admission of evidence and in the cross-examination of petitioner.

¶2The issues raised by petitioner are not cognizable in habeas corpus but must be raised by means of the statutory post-conviction remedy of appeal. Walker v. Maxwell, Warden, 1 Ohio St. 2d 136.

¶3Petitioner remanded to custody.

Taft, O. J., Zimmermah, Matthias, 0 ’Neill, Herbert, SchNeider and BrowN, JJ., concur.
/2/ohiost2d/111 · .json · Public domain