State v. Footlick’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

5 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““The question upon which this cause was certified to this court has meanwhile been determined adversely to the position taken by the Court of Appeals for Wayne County, in the case of State v. Maynard (decided December 29, 1964), 1 Ohio St.2d 57 [ 30 O.O.2d 32 , 203 N.E.2d 332 ]. a * * * “However, ‘certification of the record of a case to the Supreme Court because of conflict between judgments of Courts of Appeals upon any question, brings the entire case before the Supreme Court for review.’ Couk v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp., Ltd., 138 Ohio St. 110 [ 20 O.O. 65 , 33 N.E.2d 9 ]; Pettibone v. McKinnon, 125 Ohio St. 605 [ 183 N.E. 786 ]. Therefore, we consider the error additional to the error which was the basis of the certification, which error if well made would justify the judgment of the Court of Appeals.” State v. Footlick, supra, 2 Ohio St.2d at 207 , 81 O.O.2d at 412, 207 N.E.2d at 761 .”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 125 Ohio App. 3d 278 - State v. Burnette