2 Okla. Crim. 343 - McLaughlin v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1909
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
September 1973
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Fisher v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““If, however, an information or indictment charges two or more offenses in one count, and the accused „ sought to take advantage thereof on account of duplicity, it would be necessary for him to take steps to require the prosecutor to elect upon which charge of the offense he would rely for a conviction,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Carr v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.