Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

2 Or. 320

Flanders v. Ish

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1868

Oregon Supreme Court · decided 1868-09-15

<p>When a hill of items of account is filed under section 82 of the Code, if the same he deemed insufficient or defective by the other party, the proper practice is to move that the same he made more specific or definite.</p>

Decided 1868-09-15

By the Court.

¶1The Code, page 159, section 82, provides: “ A party may set forth in a pleading the items of an account therein alleged, or file a copy thereof with the pleadings, verified by. his own oath, &c. If he do neither, he shall deliver to the adverse party, within five days after a demand *321thereof in writing, a copy of the account, verified as in this section provided, or be precluded from giving evidence thereof.”

¶2A bill of items of a general character had been made a part of the complaint, as provided in that section, and respondent had so far complied with the statute that he could not be deemed as in default. If the bill of items, so in the record, was deemed insufficient or defective by the adverse party, we think his remedy was, not in treating the bill filed as of no moment, but in moving that the same be made more definite and certain. By the last clause in section 82, the court was authorized “ to order a further account when the one filed or delivered is defective.”

¶3We think the Circuit Court ruled properly and the judgment is afiirmed.

/2/or/320 · .json · Public domain