¶1The court determined that it had the power to authorize the issuing of the writ; but in ordinary cases would not feel itself bound to allow it indiscriminately, where there was an opportamity of making application to a circuit court at a term of such a court, and in accordance with this view of the case ordered that the writ issue in case a bond should be executed and filed with the clerk by the parties making this motion.
2 Pin. 301
May v. Keep
Decided June 15, 1849
Wisconsin Supreme Court · decided 1849-06-15
THIS was a motion made before the supreme court at the Juue term, 1849, for the allowance of a common law certio-rari, to remove the proceedings and judgment of the justice before whom the same was tiled, to this court.
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently July 1909
2 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1849-06-15
View the full empirical analysis of this case →