¶1Opinion.— Held, appellant had a lien for the rent in arrears and for current quarter which was in process of becoming due, but not for future periods which had'not commenced. At farthest appellant’s lien would not authorize the issuance of a writ for more than §147, and was below the jurisdiction of the district court. Green v. Bear Bros. & Hirsch, 68 Tex., 628; B. & B. Association v. Cochran, 60 Tex., 620.
¶2There is no error in the judgment, and it is affirmed.
¶3Aeetbmed.