State v. Reddick’s Empirical Analysis
1891
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently November 2007
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Kent · Van Etten v. State · State v. Butman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It was his employment as cashier that imposed the duty and trust upon him, and at the same time afforded him the opportunity for their violation and abuse. And even then the court seems to have regarded it as important to demonstrate that the statute under which the conviction was had deliberately eliminated as an element of the offense the condition that the subject of the embezzlement should be the property of another.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Sanders“* * * the courts have uniformly held that a general partner cannot be convicted of embezzling partnership property * * *.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Quinn
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.