Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2 SO3D 1036 - Jackson v. State

Jackson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
October 2014
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Faretta v. California · Illinois v. Allen · Cabrera-Martinez v. United States · Jones v. State · United States v. Irorere

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Although the attempted Faretta inquiries may not have passed legal muster ... the trial court did not err in requiring Jackson to proceed without counsel. This is because his recalcitrance, antagonism and even personal attacks upon each of a lengthy series of court-appointed attorneys, all of whom were required to withdraw, rendered it obvious that he simply would not permit himself to be represented by anyone and amounted to a binding forfeiture or waiver of that right.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.