Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2 So. 3d 132 - State v. Meshell

2 So. 3d 132 - State v. Meshell’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

32 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Blockburger v. United States · MP v. State · 934 So. 2d 1167 - State v. Paul · 803 So. 2d 695 - Hayes v. State · 622 So. 2d 952 - Saavedra v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Because the Florida sexual battery statutes and lewd or lascivious battery statutes may be violated in multiple, alternative ways, convictions for “sexual acts of a separate character and type requiring different elements of proof’ do not violate double jeopardy because the acts are “distinct criminal acts that the Florida Legislature has decided warrant multiple punishments.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Whoever, in the course of one criminal transaction or episode, commits an act or acts which constitute one or more separate criminal offenses, upon conviction and adjudication of guilt, shall be sentenced separately for each criminal offense; and the sentencing judge may order the sentences to be served concurrently or consecutively. For the purposes of this subsection, offenses are separate if each offense requires proof of an element that the other does not, without regard to the accusatory pleading or the proof adduced at trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “oral, anal, or vaginal penetration by, or union with, the sexual organ of another or the anal or vaginal penetration of another by any other object” — are”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.