Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2 So. 3d 470 - State v. Parks

2 So. 3d 470 - State v. Parks’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
October 2014
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Crawford v. Washington · Ohio v. Roberts · State v. Oliveaux · State v. Weiland

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A]t a minimum testimonial statements include: “prior testimony at a preliminary hearing, before a grand jury, or at a former trial; and police interrogations.” State v. Leonard, 05-42, p. 19 (La.App. 5 Cir. 7/26/05), 910 So.2d 977, 989 , citing Crawford, supra, 124 S.Ct. at 1374 . The Crawford Court stated that “testimony” is “[a] solemn declaration or affirmation made for the purpose, of establishing or proving some fact.” State v. Leonard, 05-42 at 19-20, 910 So.2d at 989 , citing Crawford, supra, 124 S.Ct. at 1364 . According to the Supreme Court, an accuser making a formal statement to government officials bears testimony in a sense that a person making a casual remark to an acquaintance does not. Id. As examples of testimonial statements, the Crawford Court lists affidavits, custodial examinations, depositions, prior testimony, confessions, or similar pretrial statements that declarants would reasonably expect to be used in a prosecution. The Supreme Court also refers to statements that were made under circumstances that would lead an objective witness reasonably to believe that the statement would be available for use at a later trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.