2 So. 3d 708 - Robinson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 2017
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · United States v. Mendenhall · Atkins v. Virginia · 451 So. 2d 743 - Neal v. State · 632 So. 2d 936 - Brent v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Those considerations include: whether the circumstances were coercive, occurred while in the custody of law enforcement or occurred in the course of a station house investigation. Other factors for consideration are the individual's maturity, impressionability, experience and education. Additionally, the court should consider whether the person was excited, under the influence of drugs or alcohol, or mentally incompetent.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.