Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

2 Stew. 469

Reid v. Gordon

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 15, 1830

Supreme Court of Alabama · decided 1830-01-15

In an action of trespass for an assault and battery, G. Gordon recovered against Thomas Reid, in Tuscaloosa Circuit Court, a judgment for ®5 damages and full costs of .suit. The suit was commenced in September, 1835, and determined at March term, 1837. The verdict is in these words: “we find the defendant guilty, and assess the plaintifis damages by occasion thereof to five dollars, besides his costs.” There was no certificate by the presiding Judge, for full costs.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1830-01-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently June 1902

3 state decisions

1018301840185018601870188018901900decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

By JUDGE COLLIER.

¶1By the act to prevent frivolous and vexatious law suits,a it is enacted, “That in all suits which may hereafter be brought in this State to reco*470ver damages for slander, or trespass, or assault and battery, the plaintiff shall not recover more costs than damages, if the damages do not exceed five dollars, unless the Judge before whom the suit was tried, shall certify that more damages ought to have been awarded by the jury.” By a reference to the record, the action appears to have been commenced several years after the passage of this act, and is therefore subject to its operation. The finding of costs by the jury cannot vary the case: the costs are a matter over which they had no control. It was only -their duty to inquire of the guilt of the plaintiff in error, and if satistified that he was guilty, assess such damages as their judgment might persuade them was pi o per; and if the Judge had thought the damages assessed were inadequate to compensate the injury, he should have certified.

¶2The judgment is therefore reversed, and such judgment rendered here, as should have been rendered below.*

¶3 Laws of Ala. Page 484.

¶4 See -the case pf McGehee v. Evans, 1 Stewart’s Reports, 589.

/2/stew/469 · .json · Public domain