2 Tenn. App. 378 - Beasley v. Gregory’s Empirical Analysis
1926
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
April 1962
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ ‘An agreement to forbear, for a time, proceedings at law or in equity, to enforce a well-founded claim, is a valid consideration for a promise. . . . Nor need the agreement to a delay be for a time certain, for it may be a reasonable time only, and yet be a sufficient consideration for a promise.’ Cathcart v. Thomas, 8 Baxt. 172 , 174 [ 67 Tenn. 172, 174 ]. To the same effect, see Turney v. Denham, 4 Baxt. 569 [ 63 Tenn. 569 ]; Townsend v. Neuhardt, 139 Tenn. 695, 698 [ 203 S. W. 255 ]; Tappan v. Campbell, 9 Yerg. 436 [ 17 Tenn. 436 ].””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. DeBord v. Brown
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.