2 Tenn. App. 598 - Brantingham v. Beasley’s Empirical Analysis
1926
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
January 1974
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is true that the principal contractor is a necessary party to a suit to enforce a mechanic’s lien.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Jordan v. Deitz
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.