Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2 TENNCRIMAPP 363 - Cable v. Russell

Cable v. Russell’s Empirical Analysis

1969

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
February 1991
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently February 1991

5 state decisions

201969197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State ex rel. Newsom v. Henderson · State Ex Rel. Edmondson v. Henderson · State Ex Rel. Gann v. Henderson · Humphreys v. State · Leiper v. Erwin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Where the circumstances of a case suggest that the habit is of sufficient regularity that it is probable that the habitual activity would be carried out in almost every instance, the probative value of habit evidence is sufficient to render it admissible to prove a particular act.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.