Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

2 Tyl. 428

Sandford v. Rose

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 15, 1803

Supreme Court of Vermont · decided 1803-05-15

ACTION for fraud in the sale of land. Case made for the opinion of the Court. The case stated a colloquium between the plaintiff and the defendants respecting the purchase of a farm, The defendants owned a farm, and proposed to sell it . tp the plaintiff, asserting that it contained one hundred and fifty acres.

Decided 1803-05-15

Curia.(Jacob, Assistant Judge, absente.)

¶1The Court are of opinion, that the evidence may be well admitted. The construction of the statute “ regulating the conveyances of real estate, and for the prevention of frauds therein,” contended for by the de*431fendant’s counsel, cannot be correct; for it would go to convert a beneficial statute, made expressly for the prevention of fraud, into an engine of fraud. "

Chauncey Langdon and Darius Chipman, for plaintiff.

¶2The evidence will be admitted.

¶3The cause was continued for trial, and afterwards, on the decease of Rose, was accommodated.

¶4--, for defendant.

/2/tyl/428 · .json · Public domain