¶1IN ERROR. Detinet for Connecticut money. On report of referrees, finding a certain sum in Connecticut money due to the plaintiff, judgment was entered for the value, in Pennsylvania money. The judgment was reversed by consent; and Lewis urged, that the Court here could give the same judgment that the Court below had given. But, on considering the authorities, he abandoned the point.
2 U.S. 158
Stewart v. Biddack
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided January 1, 1792
Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1792
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1792
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 1862
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →