Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

2 U.S. 41

Lake v. Hulbert

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May Sessions, 1787.

Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1787-05

THIS case now came before the Court, on a petition, that the appeal should be sustained: but GRIFFIN, READ, and LOWELL, Commissioners, rejected the application in the following terms.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1787-05

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently December 1862

1 state decisions

20178717901800181018201830184018501860decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1THIS case now came before the Court, on a petition, that the appeal should be sustained: but GRIFFIN, READ, and LOWELL, Commissioners, rejected the application in the following terms.

¶2BY THE COURT.

¶3In this case, the judgment of the Court will be determined by the construction of the resolution of Congress, of June, 1786.

¶4Congress having established a system of appeals, and in that system having limited a period, beyond which appeals are not to be entered, we think the resolution of June, 1786, could only mean, that, in conformity with this prior establishment, the judges might use a discretionary power, where particular circumstances, consistent with justice and right, may in their opinion require it.

¶5Whatever decree the Court might have made upon the merits of the cause, and although the property may have been illegally condemned in the maritime Courts; yet under all the circumstances of the present case, we are unanimously of opinion, that justice and right do not require, that the appeal should now be sustained.

¶6Petition dismissed.

/2/us/41 · .json · Public domain