Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

2 U.S.C. § 1317

Section 1317 · Prohibition of intimidation or reprisal

Amended 1 time on record

Applied in 47 court decisions — leading case Gomez-Perez v. Potter (2008)

Most recently applied in Jodi Breiterman v. United States Capitol Police (October 2021)

Applied most in the District Circuit Circuit (35 decisions)

How often courts cite this section

199520002010202160104-1enacted · 1995 · 104-1Gomez-Perez v. Potterleading · 2008 · Gomez-Perez v. Potter
citing decisions per year

Court decisions citing this, by year.Markers show enactment, consequential amendments, and circuit splits over this section — watch for a citation surge after a change or a disagreement. The dip in the last several years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so recent citations are undercounted.

(a) In general

It shall be unlawful for an employing office to intimidate, take reprisal against, or otherwise discriminate against, any covered employee because the covered employee has opposed any practice made unlawful by this chapter, or because the covered employee has initiated proceedings, made a charge, or testified, assisted, or participated in any manner in a hearing or other proceeding under this chapter.

(b) Remedy

The remedy available for a violation of subsection (a) of this section shall be such legal or equitable remedy as may be appropriate to redress a violation of subsection (a) of this section.

Editorial notes U.S. Code · Office of the Law Revision Counsel

References in Text

This chapter, referred to in subsec. (a), was in the original “this Act”, meaning Pub. L. 104–1, Jan. 23, 1995, 109 Stat. 3, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1301 of this title and Tables.

/2/usc/1317 · .json · Public domain