Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2 Utah 2d 12 - Bowen v. Olson

2 Utah 2d 12 - Bowen v. Olson’s Empirical Analysis

1954

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
3
states following
May 1996
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently May 1996

14 state decisions

8019541960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Owsley v. Matson · Gray v. Walker · McDonald v. McCoy · McGrail v. Fields · Cavanaugh v. Jackson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[B]y paying taxes on the land a public record is made which gives notice to the owner that his land is being claimed adversely. This purpose cannot be fulfilled if the possessor can wait any number of years, even up to the necessary seven, and then pay the taxes in one lump sum by redeeming. Under such circumstances the owner would get no current notice of adverse claims against his property, and may not until it is too late to do anything about it.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““[pjayment of taxes” and “redemption of taxes” have two separate and well defined meanings; redemption is not “payment” because it is only where the taxes have not been “paid” that there is a forfeiture and any need for redemption; a payment made after the land has been sold for taxes is not made to discharge a claim for taxes but to redeem the land from the sale and reinvest the owner with legal title.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.