2 Utah 2d 93 - Brimm v. Cache Valley Banking Co.’s Empirical Analysis
1954
Citation profile
19 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently June 2024
19 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miller v. Commonwealth · McCluskey v. Hunter · Ex parte SMITH · In Re Johnson's Estate · Jackson v. James
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“clear and convincing evidence [1] that said water right was in fact appurtenant and [2] that the grantor intended to transfer the water right with the land, even though no express mention of any water right was made in the deed.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“[S]hall be transferred by deed in substantially the same manner as real estate, except when they are represented by shares of stock in a corporation, in which case water shall not be deemed to be appurtenant to the land .... [Emphasis added.]”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“a rebutta-ble presumption that the water right represented by shares of stock ... does not automatically pass to a grantee as appurtenant to the land upon which the water is being used at the time of the grant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.