Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2 Va. App. 619 - Marlowe v. Commonwealth

2 Va. App. 619 - Marlowe v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

51
cited by 51 later decisions
1
states following
December 2018
most recently cited

51 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently December 2018 · most notably 9 Va. App. 139 - Murphy v. Commonwealth (1989), 5 Va. App. 468 - Harward v. Commonwealth (1988)

51 state decisions

1801986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 1 Va. App. 335 - Ingram v. Commonwealth · Fout v. Commonwealth · 2 Va. App. 211 - Hairston v. Commonwealth · State v. Pierce · Stapleton v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “To be timely, an objection must be made when the occasion arises—at the time the evidence is offered or the statement made.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “To require that a child or any witness be able to recall the exact date an event occurred in his or her life in order to obtain a conviction would too often preclude prosecutions in this type of case where the victims are children and the crimes are not discovered until some time after their commission. The Commonwealth’s case would too often fail because it could not specify the exact date of the offense against the child. It is this same reasoning which permits the Commonwealth to prove the commission of the crime charged on a date different than that alleged in the indictment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[w]hen time is not an element of the crime charged, the jury verdict will stand if the evidence is sufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that a crime occurred and that the defendant committed the crime, even though the evidence is such that there may be a reasonable doubt as to the day on which the offense occurred. Such a result does not constitute a denial of due process of law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.