¶1
¶2
2 Va. Col. Dec. 39
Decided April 15, 1734
General Court of Virginia · decided 1734-04-15
There being no Proof to this Writing per testes — Or that it is the Testor’s Hand Writing and one of the Witnesses declaring she does not remember signing it This could not be looked upon as a Will Especially if the Declaration after the Birth of a son be considered which strongly implys he had no Will at that Time or at least that he had an Intention to alter it And it is no Wonder the Wife proved it who gained so considerably by it.
Decided 1734-04-15
¶1
¶2