Schulte v. Schering

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1891

Washington Supreme Court · decided 1891-02-11

Littlejohn from disturbing plaintiff in his possession of the premises described in the lease.

Relies on McGlauflin v. Holman

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1891-02-11

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently November 1945

7 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1 *129The opinion of the court was delivered by

Scott, J.

¶2— The question raised in this case is in substance the same as that passed upon by us in McGlauflin v. Holman, at our May session, 1890. See 1 Wash. 239 (24 Pac. Pep. 439). There is an additional defect in this instrument in its not containing the name of one of the lessors in the granting clause, but this does not take it out of the principle recognized in the case cited. Judgment reversed, and cause remanded. The demurrer should be overruled, with leave to answer.

Anders, C. J., and Hoyt, Dunbar, and Stiles, JJ., concur.