Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2 WASH 552 - Lybarger v. State

Lybarger v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1891

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
7
states following
June 1987
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently June 1987

1 federal appellate · 15 state decisions

501891190019101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““. . . public policy will not allow cases to be tried by piecemeal. It cannot allow an appellant to rest his case on certain points of the record, and if he fail, to try his case on another and different record.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.