Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2 Wash. 2d 118 - State v. Smith

2 Wash. 2d 118 - State v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1939

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
4
states following
December 2008
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently December 2008

21 state decisions

7019391940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on People v. . Dumar · State v. Gifford · State v. Krug · State v. Comer · Commonwealth v. Hussey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In embezzlement, the property comes lawfully into the possession of the taker and is fraudulently or unlawfully appropriated by him; in larceny, there is a trespass in the unlawful taking of the property.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(a) To take the property or services of another; or (b) Having any property or services in one's possession, custody or control as bailee, factor, pledgee, servant, attorney, agent, employee, trustee, executor, administrator, guardian, or officer of any person, estate, association, or corporation, or as a public officer, or person authorized by agreement or competent authority to take or hold such possession, custody, or control, to secrete, withhold, or appropriate the same to his own use or to the use of any person other than the true owner or person entitled thereto;”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “"... [T]he state is bound by the charge as made, and must prove the offense to have been committed as there alleged, in order to sustain a conviction. 1 Wharton, Criminal Evidence, § 92; 13 Ency. Evidence, 640; State v. Gifford, 19 Wash. 464 , 53 Pac. 709 ; State v. Morgan, 21 Wash. 355 , 58 Pac. 215 ."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.