Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2 Wash. 2d 624 - Lucci v. Lucci

2 Wash. 2d 624 - Lucci v. Lucci’s Empirical Analysis

1940

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 2002
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently June 2002

4 state decisions

201940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bowers v. Good · Fielding v. Ketler · 10 La. App. 550 - Philip Werlein, Ltd. v. Madsen · Peterson v. Hicks · Short v. Dolling

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In this state the management and control of community property is vested in the husband,[ 1 ] and the wife cannot, without his consent, make any valid contract with reference thereto, unless it be for necessaries for herself or the family. When, therefore, the husband knowingly permits the wife to deal with the community property, his consent to her acts and all of her acts is implied, and he cannot afterwards hold to those which redound to his benefit and repudiate those which are against his interest. He must accept the contract as an entirety, or repudiate it as an entirety, and in this instance he will not be permitted to say that his wife had authority to contract for the land, but did not have authority to settle and relinquish any right acquired thereunder.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.