Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2 Wash. App. 452 - Johnston v. Monahan

2 Wash. App. 452 - Johnston v. Monahan’s Empirical Analysis

1970

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
October 1996
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently October 1996

4 state decisions

20197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 73 Wash. 2d 849 - Bennett Veneer Factors, Inc. v. Brewer · 72 Wash. 2d 587 - Lamm v. McTighe · Loustalot v. McKeel · Brummell v. Harris · 71 Wash. 2d 349 - In Re Larson's Estate

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) There must be either a bona fide dispute between two coterminous property owners as to where their common boundary lies upon the ground or else both parties must be uncertain as to the true location of such boundary; (2) the owners must arrive at an express meeting of the minds to permanently resolve the dispute or uncertainty by recognizing a definite and specific line as the true and unconditional location of the boundary; (3) they must in some fashion physically designate that permanent boundary determination on the ground; and (4) they must take possession of their property by such occupancy or improvements as would reasonably give constructive notice of the location of such boundary to their successors in interest; or (as an alternative to (4) above), (4a) bona fide purchasers for value must take with reference to such boundary.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.