¶1The order of the circuit judge was a nullity; it belongs only to this court and not to a judge acting as a commissioner, to give an extension of the time to surrender ; still, under the circumstances of the case, and the change in the practice of the court as to the time of giving of notices, the defendant is entitled to relief. The de - *252fendant had until the expiration of eight days in full term to surrender his principal. Had he applied to this court for time, he must have given eight days notice of such applicatian, and then, according to the rules of October term, 1827, and the practice under them, the eight days to surrender might have expired before any order was made by the court. Having been vigilant and done all in his power, a perpetual stay of proceedings against the defendant is ordered, on payment of the costs of the suit on the recognizance and of this motion. (See 3 Caines, 136.)
2 Wend. 251
Warner v. Hayden
Decided February 15, 1829
New York Supreme Court · decided 1829-02-15
Motion respecting bail in suit on recognizance. The capias against the bail was returnable on the first day of the last October term, (twentieth of October,) on which day it was served.
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently July 1800
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1829-02-15
View the full empirical analysis of this case →