Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2 WIS2D 410 - State v. Hochman

State v. Hochman’s Empirical Analysis

1957

Citation profile

41
cited by 41 later decisions
3
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

37 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently March 2019 · most notably 69 Wis. 2d 554 - State v. Amundson (1975), State v. Popenhagen (2008)

37 state decisions

1401957196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sorrells v. United States · Olmstead v. United States · State v. Marquardt · Topolewski v. State · State v. Warfield

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'evil intent' and the 'criminal design' of the offense originate in the mind of the government agent, and the defendant would not have committed an offense of that character except for the urging of the agent.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. 386 Wis. 2d 630 - State v. Polchert · 127 Wis. 2d 460 - State v. Saternus
  2. ““Entrapment is the inducement of one to commit a crime not contemplated by him for the mere purpose of instituting criminal prosecution against him.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. 386 Wis. 2d 630 - State v. Polchert · 60 Wis. 2d 443 - State v. Boutch
  3. ““. . . It is plain that the defendant’s statement of selling the ‘hotter stuff’ to his best customers indicated that the sale to the police officer was not an isolated transaction, but that the defendant had engaged in such activity in the past. It revealed too the defendant’s predisposition, — his already formed design, — to commit the offense or similar offenses conditioned by safeguards against detection.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. 43 Wis. 2d 82 - Hawthorne v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.